vBulletin statistic

June 23, 2017

Ahle Hadees – History & Info about sect of Islam

Ahle Hadees

The Ahle Hadees emerged as a distinctive orientation among Indian ulema in the late-nineteenth-century milieu of reformist thought, publication, debate, and internal proselytizing. Like other reformers, they fostered devotion to the prophet Muhammad and fidelity to shari_a. Unlike them, they opposed jurisprudential taqlid (imitation) of the classic law schools in favor of direct use of hadith. They also opposed the entire institution of Sufism, a stance that further marginalized them. Like the Deobandis, they claimed to be heirs of Shah Wali Allah (d. 1763), and they encouraged simplification of ceremony and the practice of widow remarriage. Their practices in the canonical prayer (including uttering “amen” aloud and lifting their hands at the time of bowing) led to conflicts ultimately settled in British courts.
Core supporters of the Ahl-e Hadis came from educated and often well-born backgrounds. Cosmopolitan in orientation, they identified themselves with similar groupsin Afghanistan and Arabia. Within India, they turned to princes for  Support, most famously with the marriage of Maulana Siddiq Hasan Khan (1832–1890) to the ruling Begum of Bhopal. Siddiq Hasan supported the classic interpretations of jihad,without the apologetic glosses of the day. Despite his writing  to the contrary, he was suspected of disloyalty, as was another major figure in the movement, Sayyid Nazir Husain (d. 1902), who was briefly arrested as a “Wahhabi,” as supporters of the Arab Muhammad Abd al Wahhab (1703–1792) were called. Suspicion of the Ahl-e Hadis abated by 1889, marked by the success of a campaign to drop the word “Wahhabi” in official British colonial correspondence.
The armed Lashkar-e Tayyiba, affiliated with the Ahl-e Hadis in Pakistan, is alleged to have been active both within Pakistan and Kashmir since the 1990s.
The Ahl al-Hadith (people of the traditions) appear to have developed out of a pious reaction to the assassination of Caliph Yazid b. Walid (d. 744). Prior to Yazid’s assassination, scholars who emphasized hadith (traditions of the prophet Muhammad) as the primary source for interpreting the Will of God were disorganized  and fairly removed from the widespread emphasis on applying varying levels of reason to the Qur_an. Yazid’s assassination was interpreted by more conservative groups as a revolution against the predestined plan of God. Whether or not the early Ahl al-Hadith were aligned with the Umayyad caliphate, as were many of the Jabriyya (advocates of predestination), it is clear that many understood Yazid’s assassination as a sign of the general decay of the Muslim community, the blame for which they assigned to the uncontrolled use of personal opinion by the Ahl al-Ra_y (people of considered opinion).

After the Abbasid revolution (c. 720–750), the Ahl al-Hadith developed into the main group opposed to the dominance of the rationalist theology of the Mutazilites. During the religious inquisition or Mihna (833–850) many of the Ahl al-Hadith were imprisoned for refusing to agree to the doctrine of the Created Qur_an. Members of the Ahl al-Hadith, such as Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d. 855), became important religious and social leaders due to their refusal to recant their beliefs in the eternal nature of the Qur_an. After the Mihna, the Ahl al-Hadith led an anti rationalist movement that forced advocates of rationalist thought underground. In the centuries following the initial triumph of the Ahl al-Hadith, a middle ground emerged that placed greater emphasis on a combination of reason and tradition. The Ahl al-Hadith formed a school of legal thought named after Ahmad Ibn Hanbal that continued to pursue legal methods that focused less on uses of reason and more on tradition. The Hanbali fixation on tradition led to a series ofreform movements that have sought to “revive” the moral and ethical standards of the  first generations of Muslims. The contemporary influence of Ahl al-Hadith ideology continues to be important for a number of diverse groups. Organizations such as the Indonesian Muhammadiyah and the Islamic Society of North America, as well as the violent al-Qa_ida and Islamic Jihad, each bases its ideologies on ideas that emerged out of the Ahl al-Hadith and Hanbali movement over the last eight centuries.

Comments

  1. Ahl-e-hadees wahid maslak hai jo Allah our Allah k pyaray Rasool Mohammad (PBAH) ke Aehkamaat k mutabiq zindgi basar kr raha hain…….our Pyaray Sehaaba ikraam ki pervi krtay aaa raha hain…….InshaAllah Qayamat tak Allah ka HUKAM par zindgi guzaar dain ge…Aaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen

  2. DUSHMAN E RAFIZI AND NAJADI says:

    TODAY WE SEE NAJADI KINGS AND PRINCES DOING TABZEER AND ISRAF .THEY LIVE IN PALACES OWNS HUNDREDS OF CAR FLEET .AND EAT AND BATH IN GOLD VESSELS . MAKING HAJJ MORE AND MORE DIFFICULT FOR A COMMOMN MUSLIM AND MOST PROFITABLE FOR THEM.
    AND SHAMELESSLY AND STUBBORNLY CLAIM THEMSELVES HEIRS OF RASOOL (SAW) ,KHULAFA (RA) AND SAHABAH (RA). AS THEY HAVE PATENTS AND COPY RIGHTS OF ISLAM. THEIR ACTS ARE CLEARLY AGAINST THE LIFE TEACHINGS OF NABI (SAW )M AND SAHABA (RA). THEY ARE
    ENEMIES OF NABI (SAW) AND SAHABA (RA)THESE AHLAE KHABEES NAJADI DOGS, KHWARIJ ,SAUDI PIGS .THEY FOLLOW INSANE Shaytan WHO came in the form of the Najdi Shaykh. IT WAS THAT BASTARD WHO ARRANGED BLOODSHED IN KABAH THIRD TIME AFTERARRIVAL OF ISLAM (FIRST WAS BY HAJJAJ BIN YOUSUF.AND SECOND TIME BY TAHIR QARAMATI WHO TOOK HIJRA E ASWAD WITH HIM AND HAJJ WAS DISCONTINUED FOR 23 YEARS IN A ROW)
    THESE NAJADI BASTARDS ONLY KILL SALAH MUSLIMS . LIFTING SWORD IS A BIG THING NO MOTHER FUCKER NAJAHI DEVIL LIFTED PEN OR SAID EVEN A WORD FOR THOSE QARAMATI PIGS.
    SAME NAJADI DOGS MAKE FUN OF SAHABAH AND SAY DIRTY WORDS FOR NABI (SAW).THATS WHY THEY INSIST THAT PROPHET (SAW) HAD NO KNOWLWEDGE OF GHAIB OR FUTURE BECAUSE ALL THE HADITHS WHICH ALERT ABOUT YOU AHL E KHABEES THE UN LAW FUL BREEDD OF NAJADI DOGS ARE IN THE FORM OF PROPHECIES.(that the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), after being informed by Allah Ta’ala, is aware of everything that happened and will happen.

    Allah Ta’ala says: “Allah Alone is the Knower of the Unseen. He never grants the Knowledge of his Ghayb to anyone but to His chosen Messengers and appoints guard before them and behind them.” (Surah Jinn, 72:26-27). )
    Allah TA’ALA has told the Prophet (May Allah bless him and grant him peace), you must thank Allah TA’ALA Who has informed you of what has already happened and what will happen in the future and this is a great grace of Allah upon you.

    (Tafsir Tabari under verse 113 of Surah Al-Nisa).

    THE THINGS WHICH WE NOW SEE WERE IN SOIL OF NAJAD SINCE BEGINING.

    Hafidhh Ibn Kathir writes: when the Kuffar of Makkah had a meeting concerning the Prophet Sallal laho alihi wasalam, an old man came claiming

    “I am a Najdi, what ever you want to know, I will be helpful”. This Najdi Shaykh then gave his view against the Prophet (Sallallahu’ aliahi wa sallam), through out the meeting.
    [Tareekh Ibn Kathir. Volume 4]

    The Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] stated: I fear from the Najdi’s.
    [Bukhari Chapter on Jihad]

    The Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] stated: That the Fitnah will emerge from the east. [Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Fitnah]

    Abdullah Ibn Umar narrates:

    The Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] made Du’a for Syria and Yemen, some people asked him: “Ya Rasoolallah (Sallallahu’ aliahi wa sallam) pray for Najd.” The Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] again repeated Dua for Syria and Yemen. They again requested for Najd. Upon the third time the Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] said: “There will be earthquakes there, tribulations will emerge there and a horn of Shaytan will emerge from there”. [Bukhari, Kitabul Fitan]

    The brother of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab al Najdi, Shaykh Sulaiman bin Abdul Wahab, said about his brother, “The horn of Shaytan which the Prophet (Sallallahu’ aliahi wa sallam) referred to is you.”
    [Sawaa’iqul Ilahiya]

    The false Prophet, Musailima Kadhab was also born in Najd AND THE DECENDENTS OF ENEMY OF ISLAM NOW RESURFACED AS NAJADI KHAIN AND THIEVES. After reading the history of Najd, you will see that this is a place of Sh’yateen. Secondly the Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] predicted earthquakes and tribulations for this place indeed there occurred such an earthquake that we can still hear its bang over 2 centuries later.

    Many people say that Najd is high land and that the Dua was not made regarding the high land. However in this Hadith the Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] mentioned the places Syria, Yemen and not the type of land, therefore the word Najd in this Hadith refers to the place Najd itself which is in Saudi Arabia not in Iraq.

    Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi’s Jihad was not against kafirs but against those Muslims who held the Aq’aid of Ahl-e-Sunnah, like the Khawarij, he considered all other Muslims to be kafirs.

    Khawarji’s are those people who consider all other Muslims to be non-believers apart from themselves. They are supposed to kill people who have trust in pious people, as they did with Khabab for saying that he loved Ali radi-allah-ho-unho. Also they would call any person who has committed a major sin a non-believer. Even for anything small they would call the Sahabas non-believer’s as they did with Uthman, Talha, and Zubair Radi allahu taala unhu ajmaeen.

    The Khawrij’s would only take the literal meaning of the Holy Qur’an and that would be it they would take it no further. They would call the Sahee (true) Hadith fabricated, such as Hadith-e-Rajm, (stoning the Adulator to death), they would label their opponents non-believers and consider it right to take their belongings and their wives as slave girls. When the Khawarij spoke they would try to refer to the Qur’an or the Hadith as much as possible.

    It has been said by Abdullah bin Umar radi-allah-hounho that Khawarij’s are so mischievous that they fit those Qur’anic verses that were revealed about the non-believers.
    “Bukhari chap, Al-murtadeen”

    For further details please consult books by Ibn Hazam Sharastani, Abu-Mansoor Ma’tirdi, Abu-Zahra Misrei and Mazhabe Islamiyah This was a strange thing as even Abdul Wahab’s blind followers could not digest it. Shaykh Juhri wrote: ‘I think that Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi apart from himself and his followers has labelled all other Muslims as kafir; while not all Muslims have worshipped graves and especially the Ulama. At the time no Muslim’s worshiped grave’s but that was an excuse by Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi so that he could kill the Muslims.
    [“Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab page 36”]

    Shaykh Juhri says: “I cannot find any reason why they should all have been labelled Kafirs”. Juhri was a strong follower of Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab but even he was surprised at this action by [Muhammad Bin Abdal Wahab ]

    Now returning to the movement of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi, with the help of Amir-e-Duriya He destroyed the shrines. (Graves of Companions) Companions who were in the Najd.

    He killed those people who were leaders of the Ahl-e-Sunnah and took their properties and possessions. With the support of those Arabs that were nationalist. They continued increasing their reign, coming out of Najd until Hijaz was taken by them and they managed to win control over the whole of Jazeerat-ul-Arab.

    During this time the Ottoman Khilafah was busy engaged in international battles and was therefore unable to respond in a swift manner. In 22 June 1792, Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi died upon which Qadhi Shawkaani wrote a poem with regard to this incident; one sentence was: “Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab was that son, with whose Noor the Hijaz and its surrounding places became enlightened”. See how the person who sought help from the Kafirs is being praised!!!

    For some time after, the rule was in the hands of Ahle-Saud. It was during this time, during the reign of the son of Muhammad ibn Saud, that the Ottomans sent Muhammad Ali Pasha against him, who defeated him, finished their influence in the reign. Again’ Jazeeratul Arab became part of the Islamic Caliphate, the royal family fled to Kuwait. Some time later, the Ahl-e-Saood managed to re-gain control over Jazeeratul Arab and changed its name to Saudi Arabia. Grants were given from abroad to spread Wahabi’ism. Initially it was spread by the sword but now it is through money. The Saudis came to Europe and spent the wealth from the Bait-ul-Maal as though it were their Father’s wealth. In front of the guilty Saudi Ulamas all this Haram and Bid’ah goes on but they say nothing, but will still give Fatwa’s against Milad-un-Nabi.

    An interesting story: When Shaykh Faisal was deputy prime minister of Saudi Arabia, he toured India, and put flowers upon Mahatma Ghandi’s grave:
    [“News, 11th May 1955”]

    In 1957 Shah Sa’ud went on a tour to America, with him was the defence minister Fahad bin Sa’ud, who put flowers on the grave of George Washington. [“Kohstaan 2nd February 1957”]

    When Saudi Shaykhs go to Muslim countries they do not place flowers on any of the graves of the Awliya because it may dent their Aqeedah, but by placing flowers upon the graves of Mahatma Ghandi & George Washington maybe this strengthens their Aqeedah.

    Shah Sa’ud whilst on tour in India said, “I am satisfied with Indian government that they are treating the Muslims with justice”. This was at the time when Muslims were being sacrificed in Kashmir.

    Shah Sa’ood invited the Indian Prime Minister, Pandat Jawahar Nehru to tour Saudi Arabia, When he arrived, the newspaper ‘Al-Balad Sa’oodia Makkah’ reported thus:

    “When Nehru arrived in Riyadh, the Indian national anthem was played, the women of the royal family left their homes in the cars to welcome him.” Every thing we have written about Nehru is taken from Tareek Najd-wa-Hijaz by Allma Ghulam Rasood Sa’idi and Safar Nama by Muhammad Asim Najdi who was with Maudoodi when he toured in 1960.

    Al-Balad Sa’oodia then wrote an article: We welcome Nehru as he is a peaceful and sensible person, and it is our prayer that he lives thousands of years. Shah Sa’ood secretary colonel Sadat said: ‘Mr Nehru soft voice has more effect than the bang of guns’ and called him the angel of Asia and also called him a Rasool’ our assumption is that he did not mean Prophet but messenger just as many Muslims use the name Abdul Mustafa, meaning not a worshipper but a follower.

    When they received Nehru, they called him Aman-ur-Rasool. He toured a school where the rulers studied, where the Geeta was sung. We have a right to ask: “why do not the Saudi Ulama say that these things are Haram, to sing Geeta, for Muslim women to come out of their homes to welcome Kafir rulers, to put flowers on the graves of kaafirs, to call the person who slaughtered uncountable Muslims in India a messenger of peace (Amman)? Oh those who ask for authentic proof for Milad-un Nabi, by Allah show us even a da’eef (weak) hadith to justify these actions”.

    When they welcomed Nehru in such a way, back. In India and Pakistan marches and rallies were organised in protest. The King was sent a telegram in 1960 by Saiyed Maududi, who came from Hajj to Saudi, he was invited on Royal order to Riyadh. Delivering his speech he said: “If we were to invite the Prime Minister of Israel to Pakistan and welcome him like you welcomed Nehru, how would you feel? You called the enemy of Muslims the messenger of peace”. The whole world criticised them for this, but no Saudi Ulama made any objections.

    In the west people do Dhikr in Masjids, and do Na’at Khanni, once a month they read the Qur’an and convey the reward to Muslims who have parted from this world, especially Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilanis. The Najdi students who come to the west Write piles of books against this and ask for authentic proofs but the people and leaders of their own countries they were to put flowers on the graves of kaffirs they would quietly digest it .

    Abu Amir al-Hawdhani said, “Mu’awiyah ibn Abi Sufyan (may Allah be pleased with him) stood among us and said, ‘Beware! The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) stood among us and said’: ‘Beware! The People of the Book before (you) were split up into 72 sects, and this community will be split up into 73, seventy-two of them will go to Hell and one of them will go to Paradise, and it is the majority group (Jama’ah).’ (Sunan Abu Dawood 3/4580)

    And ahle-hadith are definitely not a majority group.nor they are ever going to be…….
    Ahlus sunnah [according to many Sahih hadiths ] will also be Majority group of Ummah, Today the largest group of muslims in the world are Sufi sunni follow ahle sunnat aqeeda , in subcontinent Brelwi sufi muslims having same aqeeda are largest group
    The beliefs of Ahl as Sunna’h wal Jama’h are the same as the beliefs of the Sahaba or Noble Companions of the Beloved Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) and the Salf as Saliheen (our great pious predecessors).

    The Beloved Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) advised us to remain firm with the largest group of Muslims and remain steadfast upon their way in beliefs and in actions.

    Allah will never let my Ummah agree upon misguidance, and the hand of Allah is over the group (Jama’ah), so follow the great mass of believers (Sawad ul-‘Azam), and whoever dissents from them departs to hell
    [COLOR=”rgb(139, 0, 0)”]
    [A narration “AUTHENTICATED” and reported by al-Hakim (1/116), and al-Dhahabi agreed with him][/COLOR]

    “Verily Allah will not make my Community — or Muhammad’s Community — agree on error, and Allah’s hand is with the largest Congregation.”

    [Reference :Tirmidhi (gharib) #2256, Cairo ed. `Aridat al-ahwadhi (11:9)]

    Whoever among you wants to be in the middle of Paradise, let him cling to the Congregation.”

    [Reference : Tirmidhi related it and said it is sound (sahih).]

    “My Community shall never agree upon misguidance, therefore, if you see divergences, you must follow the greater mass or larger group

    References

    Ibn Majah (2:1303 #3950) from Anas with a weak chain.

    Sahih Bukhari Book 56 Hadith 803
    Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman:
    ,
    ….. He said, “Yes, there will be some people who will invite others to the doors of Hell, and whoever accepts their invitation to it will be thrown in it (by them).” I said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Describe those people to us.” He said, “They will belong to us and speak our language (i.e Arabic) ” I asked, “What do you order me to do if such a thing should take place in my life?”
    ,
    He said, “Adhere to the CONGREGATION OF MUSLIMS and their Chief.” I asked, “If there is neither a group (of Muslims) nor a chief (what shall I do)?” He said, “Keep away from all those different sects, even if you had to bite (i.e. eat) the root of a tree, till you meet Allah while you are still in that state.”[END]

    Now what does Jammah of muslims means in this hadith,

    the most authentic classical Tafsir of Sahih bukhari which is Fath ul Bari my

    Imam Ibn e Hajr Asqalni says

    ” Jammah in this hadith means Sawad ul Azam (the majority group) ”

    Reference:( Fath ul Bari, volume 29, pg 331 , By Imam Asqalani (rah))

    “Whoever leaves the Community or separates himself from it by the length of a span, dies the death of the Jahiliyya (period of ignorance prior to Islam)”

    [Sahih Muslim (Imara #55) through Ibn `Abbas. Muslim relates it with slight variations through three more chains. Ibn Abi Shayba also relates it in his Musannaf.]

    “Shaytan is a wolf like the wolf that preys on sheep, taking the isolated and the stray among them; therefore, avoid factionalism and keep to the Congregation and the collective and the masjid.”

    [Reference: Ahmad relates it through Mu`adh and through Abu Dharr, the two chains being respectively fair [hasan] and sound [sahih] according to Haythami in Majma` al-zawa’id 6/123]

Speak Your Mind

*